Out of all
the times you have heard news about fraccing how often have you heard about
water contamination, accidents, and overall poor performances? Now how many times have you heard about
successful fraccing jobs with no consequences?
As a civil engineering student I have not had much exposure to fraccing,
but when I do hear about it that usually means there has been an accident and
my guess is that your experiences are the same unless you are part of the
industry.
Warning:
Video may contain content not suitable for children.
Water
contamination tends to be one of the most focused topics for consequences
coming out of fraccing projects. There is a possibility that the fraccing could lead to a change of color and odor in the water
due to the new contaminants, but a more common risk is leaking methane gas directly into
the water supply. The methane gas does not affect the water’s color, taste, or odor making it hard to detect, but
leaves the water susceptible to being able to ignite on fire. Currently there are no regulations on
drinking water concerning the amount of methane because scientists have been
unable to predict how much of a health hazard it can be in the drinking water. Knowing about this risk could make any person
who is on the fence about their opinion of fraccing go against it, but before
making a decision you should also know about some of the positives and
regulations overseeing fraccing jobs.
Natural gas is much cleaner to burn than coal making it better
environmentally as an energy resource. Also the increase in
acquiring the natural gas will create jobs and reduce energy prices because the
United States would have the chance to become more energy independent. With rising energy prices across the country
along with high unemployment rates this could be a golden opportunity if the
right approach is taken. Many of the
studies looking for water contamination from fraccing are inconclusive because
there is never any baseline data of the groundwater to compare to which has
allowed there to be zero confirmed cases of contamination by fraccing in the
groundwater. The few cases that have
been able to prove there is contamination in the water have found that the
contamination came from poor wastewater disposal and performance of the well
casing. This is why many of the large
companies in the fraccing industry make sure to take every step in the process
slowly to make sure the fraccing job is done right. As far as regulations go, the EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) is assessing each fraccing job on a case by case basis to determine the environmental effects. In all of the recent cases the EPA has not
seen a reason to challenge any of the fraccing jobs that were assessed. Any fraccing site within 500 meters of an
environmentally sensitive area or two kilometers of a town, coastline, or major
water storage area will be assessed diligently by the EPA. The EPA knows fraccing is a possible threat
to the environment and they are doing everything they can to make sure the
fraccing industry is being careful when fraccing to avoid any contamination in
the groundwater as much as possible.
Hopefully
this has an impact showing that the industry is making an effort to practice safe fraccing, but if anyone is still on the fence or
wants more information I encourage them to do research on their own, look at
the links connected to each post on the blog, and continue to follow the blog
throughout the semester.
-Adam Bent
The lack of historic groundwater data is one that's a problem in many areas. There was a guest speaker on campus last semester, Dr. Abby Kinchy, who explained that some local citizens near potential sites for fracking have started collecting data themselves, so that there will be a comparison point.
ReplyDeleteAlso, would you mind sharing your links about the few cases where methane was attributed to other sources? I'd like to read a little more on that.